‘Code red’ sounds serious. ‘Unequivocal’ sounds definitive. And yet… we live in a world of Brexit denial, Antivaxxers, Mask Free-Dumb, The Election Big Lie and Zapponic Picnics at the Merrion. What chance has this planet got if the truth is a perpetual political football? Yes, UN Secretary General Gutteres made it clear that the “evidence is irrefutable” and that global heating is a “code red for humanity”. And yes, the 3,000 word report written by 234 scientists for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) stated that climate change was “clearly human-caused” and “an established fact”. So, this looked like a very robust platform to appeal for urgent common sense and survival. Silly me.
Not for the first time, the White House didn’t get the memo from humanity.
We woke up to headlines this morning that the Biden administration has called on OPEC to boost oil production to stem the rise in gasoline prices. More fossil fuels please. More gas emissions, more heat. How depressing and lethal. However, this writer believes the lethal threat now supported by “irrefutable” evidence is potentially a very positive game changer. As death tolls mount from German floods, Mediterranean super-fires and Canadian heat shocks the nexus between mortality and climate change is established. Indeed, this is an ‘established fact’ now agreed by 195 sovereign states and 234 scientists. Bingo! Or so the lawyers might say. Those sharp legal minds might also mention precedent….
As recently as May this year the oil monster, Royal Dutch Shell, was ordered by a court in The Hague to massively accelerate its planned greenhouse gas emissions cuts. The action was taken by 17,000 Dutch citizens and failed to get the mainstream attention it deserved. However, the board of Royal Dutch Shell certainly paid attention as the ruling forced the company to commit to reduce gas emissions by 45% before 2030 rather than the 20% planned. The law might be humanity’s best hope. We also note that the world’s largest mining company, BHP Billiton, is currently considering its exit from all fossil fuel activities. My sense is that the boards of most fossil fuel companies are urgently considering the following:
- Litigation risk has just gone into global over-drive.
- Financial/funding risks are also rising as an estimated $53 trillion of investment funds claim to be steering capital based on sustainability(ESG) mandates/principles.
- Just 100 companies apparently account for 70% of total greenhouse gas emissions.
- ESG risk has supply chain effects ie customers, suppliers, investors etc are ALL under pressure to ensure their commercial eco-system is adhering to corporate good citizen principles.
- Insurance and banking relationships are critical to most businesses. Now consider Australian contractor, BMD Group, recently failed to obtain insurance for a coal mine project due to environmental concerns.